Tesla Robotaxi Tracker
Tesla Robotaxi Tracker
Verified operating locations, permits, service model and disclosed deployment milestones.
NHTSA opens DP26010 petition review over Robotaxi school-zone speed claims
| Checked item | Verified result | Interpretation boundary | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Regulatory action Direct NHTSA record |
ODI opened defect petition DP26010 to evaluate the allegations and determine whether to grant or deny the petition. | A petition review is not a formal defect investigation. NHTSA has not granted the petition, found a defect or ordered a recall. | NHTSA datasets and APIsNHTSA investigation dataset |
|
Allegation and scope Petitioner claim |
The petitioner alleges that the ADS exceeds posted speed limits in active school zones. NHTSA's record names 2026 Robotaxi Model Y and Cybercab vehicles and says three video links were submitted as supporting material. | The allegation is not a finding. The dataset does not establish that every covered vehicle behaved this way, and the supporting videos alone do not establish a fleet-wide rate. | NHTSA DP26010 rows |
|
Independent reporting check Corroborated |
A readable specialist report independently reproduced the DP26010 case number, vehicle scope, school-zone allegation and petition-stage status. | Independent reporting adds context but does not convert the petition into a defect determination. Tesstudio relies on the NHTSA record for the controlling regulatory language. | Electrek report |
Tesstudio verified the NHTSA flat-file entries directly on October 12, 2026. The case is listed under ODI number 11766676. All speed behavior remains described as the petitioner's allegation unless NHTSA publishes a finding.
Texas roster reaches 739 vehicles as Cybercab count rises to 319
| Checked item | Verified result | Interpretation boundary | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Current Texas roster Direct state lookup |
739 vehicles: 420 Model Y and 319 Cybercab, all listed under Tesla Robotaxi, LLC. | The state list is an authorized-vehicle roster. It is not a live count of vehicles carrying passengers, available in the Robotaxi app or operating simultaneously. | Texas TxMCCS vehicle lookup |
|
Change since September 3 check Tesstudio verified snapshots |
The roster increased from 420 to 739 vehicles. Cybercab rose from 45 to 319, while Model Y rose from 375 to 420. | These are point-in-time state-roster comparisons. They do not establish how many vehicles were active, dispatchable or carrying paid riders at either checkpoint. | Earlier Tracker verificationCurrent state roster |
|
Tesla service claim Company-reported |
Tesla said it had scaled to more than 300 Cybercabs serving Austin, described as an eightfold increase in 30 days. | The company statement does not define how many were dispatchable at one time or how many completed passenger trips. Tesla's official Robotaxi page lists current service cities but does not publish a live per-city fleet count. | Tesla RobotaxiTeslarati reportEV report |
Texas authorized-vehicle roster reaches 420
| Checked item | Verified result | Interpretation boundary | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Current Texas roster Direct state lookup |
420 vehicles: 375 Model Y and 45 Cybercab, all listed as model year 2026. | The state list is an authorized-vehicle roster. It is not a live count of vehicles carrying passengers, available in the Robotaxi app or operating simultaneously. | Texas TxMCCS vehicle lookup |
|
Recent change Independently tracked |
Third-party snapshots show 314 vehicles on September 1 and 420 on September 2, a net increase of 106. The Model Y count rose from 269 to 375; the Cybercab count remained 45. | TxMCCS exposes the current list but not a public change log. The historical comparison therefore depends on independent snapshots, not a dated state filing. | FSD Database registry historyTesla North report |
Robotaxi service hours and current cities
| Checked item | What Tesla reports | Verification boundary | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Current service cities Direct Tesla page |
Austin, Dallas and Houston in Texas, plus Miami, Orlando and Tampa in Florida. | Tesla describes service as available in limited areas. The city list does not mean every address in each metro is eligible. | Tesla RobotaxiTesla Support: Robotaxi |
|
Operating window Company-reported |
The official Robotaxi account said service now runs from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., seven days a week. | Tesla Support continues to state that hours may vary by area. Riders should use the Robotaxi app to confirm whether requests are open at their location and time. | Tesla Robotaxi operating-hours postTesla North report reproducing the post |
|
Fleet and routing Unquantified claim |
Tesla said the unsupervised fleet is "a lot bigger" and that upgraded vehicle distribution and routing should reduce waits. | Tesla did not publish a vehicle count, city-by-city fleet split, wait-time series or methodology. Tesstudio therefore does not convert the statement into a fleet-size or performance metric. | Tesla Robotaxi statement |
Latest NHTSA ADS data check
| Record | What the filing says | What it does not prove | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Austin, Texas Confirmed record Report 13781-15809 |
Tesla reported a 2026 Model Y with ADS verified engaged and no in-vehicle operator. Its narrative says the vehicle was stopped at a red left arrow when an SUV first hit another passenger vehicle and then contacted the Tesla. No passengers or injuries were reported. | The record does not establish a fleet-wide safety rate or an official legal fault finding. NHTSA warns that entity-submitted reports may be incomplete or unverified. | NHTSA ADS incident CSV |
|
Dallas, Texas Confirmed record Report 13781-15808 |
Tesla reported a 2026 Model Y with ADS verified engaged and no in-vehicle operator. Its narrative says the vehicle was parked in an alley when another parked vehicle reversed into its right side. No passengers or injuries were reported. | The two records are reportable crashes, so they should not be described as a crash-free month. The narratives support a narrow description of the reported sequence, not a comparative safety conclusion. | NHTSA methodology and limitations |
Independent reporting context: Tesla North, August 17, 2026. Tesstudio checked its claims against the NHTSA source file and narrowed the wording where the source data did not support a broader conclusion.
How this tracker works
Tesstudio monitors first-party announcements, regulatory records and independent specialist sources. Every entry keeps its original source, evidence status and last-verified time. Rumors and community sightings are never presented as confirmed facts.
Tracked fields
Location
City, state or country and operating boundary.
Service mode
Driverless, safety-monitored, employee pilot or public service.
Regulatory status
Permit, filing and regulator of record.
Fleet
Only company or regulator-disclosed counts are reported as official.
Evidence labels
| Confirmed | Supported by a company, regulator or another authoritative primary source. |
|---|---|
| Reported | Supported by at least two independent professional sources, with no primary confirmation yet. |
| Developing | A verified event is continuing and material details may change. |
| Unconfirmed | A clearly labeled signal retained for context; it is not treated as fact. |
Last structural review: August 12, 2026. Individual entries will show their own last-verified timestamps.