Tesla’s Reported 124-Stall San Francisco Supercharger Plan: What the Drawings Show

Proposed · Public Permit Drawings Reported

30-Second Brief

• EVwire and Business Insider report on public permit drawings for a proposed 124-stall Tesla V4 Supercharger at 75 Waterloo Street in San Francisco.
• The reported plan includes charging equipment and a small amenity building; it is not an announcement that the station is approved or operating.
• The drawings do not establish an opening date or a Robotaxi/Cybercab purpose.
• For drivers, the actionable status remains “proposed”: use Tesla’s live Supercharger map before relying on it.

What Happened

Two recent reports describe a large Tesla charging proposal in San Francisco based on public planning-permit drawings. EVwire’s report includes a site-plan image captioned as a proposed 124-stall Supercharger at 75 Waterloo Street. Business Insider separately reports the same proposed location and stall count.

The proposed parcel is near US-101 in the city’s southern industrial area. The reports describe V4 stalls and a compact support building. They also describe the plan as a proposal, which matters: permit drawings are evidence of a planned design, not proof that construction, commissioning or public operation will occur on a specific date.

What Is Confirmed

• Reported plan scope: Both cited reports describe 124 proposed V4 stalls at 75 Waterloo Street.
• Permit-plan status: EVwire identifies its plan image as sourced from City of San Francisco planning permits.
• Not a live station: Neither report establishes that charging is available to the public today.

What Remains Unconfirmed

We could not independently retrieve the city’s original permit record during this run, so we do not state that approval has been granted. Tesla has not provided a public opening date in the sources reviewed. The reports’ discussion of possible Robotaxi use is analysis, not a Tesla-confirmed purpose; the permit drawings reportedly do not identify Robotaxi or Cybercab operations.

Why It Matters

If built, a 124-stall site would be notable for a dense urban market, where curb access, queueing and electrical interconnection can constrain charging expansion. The value is not only the raw stall count: a large site could serve local drivers, airport-area traffic and fleet operations. But capacity on paper is not capacity drivers can use; construction, utility work and commissioning are decisive.

What Tesla Owners Should Know

1. Check live status, not proposal stories. Use Tesla’s Supercharger map before routing to 75 Waterloo Street.
2. Do not infer availability or price. Neither is established by the drawings.
3. Separate plan from purpose. A large utility-focused layout does not prove Robotaxi use.

Tesstudio Analysis

The proposed scale is the real signal. A 124-stall layout suggests Tesla is studying a high-throughput urban site rather than a routine neighborhood installation. The responsible reading, however, stops there: published drawings can change, permits may be revised, and Tesla has not publicly committed to a delivery timeline in the evidence reviewed.

Our view: follow the permit trail and Tesla’s map for the next decisive signals. Until then, the correct consumer label is “planned—not available.”

Sources & Reporting Notes

1. EVwire: Tesla files plans for massive 124-stall Supercharger site — reports on the plan and displays the cited permit-drawing images.
2. Business Insider: Tesla plans a 124-stall San Francisco charging hub — independent reporting on the proposed site and drawings.

Reporting note: This story reports what the cited outlets say public permit drawings show. Tesstudio did not independently retrieve the underlying city record, and no third-party image is presented as Tesstudio-owned. Assertions about approval, opening timing and Robotaxi use are explicitly excluded.

Update & Correction Log

August 14, 2026: Initial publication. Article uses only source-linked permit-plan images and labels the project proposed pending primary-record confirmation.